Resources
Educational summaries of notable Singapore criminal judgments. Not legal advice.
Educational summary of named public judgments, drawn from the courts’ published grounds. Stated neutrally, factually and non-graphically. This page discusses serious offences, including capital ones, at the level of legal principle. Not legal advice. Kidnapping for ransom is one of the most serious offences in Singapore law. The governing authority on how it is sentenced […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nuzaihan bin Kamal Luddin [1999] SGHC 275 is an early but enduring authority on sentencing for computer crime in Singapore. It established that general deterrence can take precedence when sentencing offences under the Computer Misuse Act, given how easily such offences are […]
Educational summary of a named public judgment, drawn from the court’s published grounds. Stated neutrally, factually and non-graphically. Not legal advice. Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng [2017] SGCA 6; [2017] 1 SLR 373 is a leading decision on the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA). It did not concern harassment in the everyday sense, but a […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Rioting is treated seriously in Singapore because it is a collective, public-order offence. The benchmark sentencing authority is Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor [2004] SGHC 33, which set indicative ranges for rioting under section 147 of the Penal Code; those ranges were recently recalibrated by […]
Educational summary of a named public judgment, drawn from the court’s published grounds. Stated neutrally, factually and non-graphically. Not legal advice. CNK v Public Prosecutor [2024] SGCA 42 is a Court of Appeal decision on sentencing for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) of the Penal Code, in a case where a […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Huang Ying-Chun v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGHC 269; [2019] 3 SLR 606 is a leading Singapore decision on sentencing for money laundering under the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (the CDSA). It set out a harm–culpability framework for offenders who […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Wong Chee Meng v Public Prosecutor [2020] SGHC 144 is the leading decision on sentencing for corruption involving the public sector. It set out a structured harm–culpability framework for offences under section 6 read with section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act — the aggravated […]
Educational summary of a named public judgment, drawn from the court’s published grounds. Stated neutrally and factually. Not legal advice. Public Prosecutor v BDB [2017] SGCA 69; [2018] 1 SLR 127 is a Court of Appeal decision setting out sentencing benchmarks for voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Penal Code. It arose […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Logachev Vladislav v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGHC 12; [2018] 4 SLR 609 is one of the most influential Singapore sentencing decisions — not because of the offence itself, but because it set out a clear five-step harm–culpability framework that has since been adapted to many other […]
Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Adri Anton Kalangie v Public Prosecutor [2018] SGCA 40 is a Court of Appeal decision on two things at once: the sentencing framework for importing methamphetamine below the capital threshold, and the important question of whether a new sentencing framework applies to offences committed before it […]
Free assessment
No pressure — clear next steps first.
