Skip to content

Resources

Harassment & Protection Orders

Harassment and Protection Orders in Singapore under POHA — stalking, threats, protection and expedited orders, penalties and remedies explained.

Harassment law in Singapore, principally under the Protection from Harassment Act, addresses conduct such as threats, abuse and stalking — whether it happens in person or online — and provides ways for those affected to seek protection.

These guides explain both sides of this area: the offences a person can face, and the remedies available to those affected, including protection orders and expedited orders. We set out what the law covers, how applications are approached, and what to expect from the process. Harassment matters often move quickly and involve strong emotions on all sides. Whether you need protection or are responding to an allegation, speaking to a criminal lawyer early helps you take the right steps.

Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor (criminal intimidation)

Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Ye Lin Myint v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGHC 221 is the leading sentencing decision on criminal intimidation. It set out a structured framework for the offence, in a case involving an anonymous intimidation campaign, and clarified how the courts weigh threats — including threats made anonymously […]

Read more

Public Prosecutor v Quek Li Hao (loan-shark harassment)

Educational summary of named public judgments. Not legal advice. Public Prosecutor v Quek Li Hao [2013] SGHC 152 is a leading sentencing decision on loan-shark harassment — the “runner” offences under the Moneylenders Act, such as splashing paint and writing threatening graffiti at debtors’ homes. It set a clear benchmark that courts continue to apply. […]

Read more

Lim Teck Kim v Public Prosecutor (unlawful stalking)

Educational summary of a named public judgment, drawn from the court’s published grounds. Stated neutrally and non-graphically. Not legal advice. Lim Teck Kim v Public Prosecutor [2019] SGHC 99 is a leading sentencing decision on unlawful stalking under section 7 of the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA). It proposed a structured framework for an offence […]

Read more

Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng

Educational summary of a named public judgment, drawn from the court’s published grounds. Stated neutrally, factually and non-graphically. Not legal advice. Attorney-General v Ting Choon Meng [2017] SGCA 6; [2017] 1 SLR 373 is a leading decision on the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA). It did not concern harassment in the everyday sense, but a […]

Read more

Criminal intimidation (ss 503–506)

Criminal intimidation (ss 503–506). Not legal advice — educational Singapore criminal law overview. Speak with a qualified criminal lawyer. Speak with counsel.

Read more